Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digital Twins for Cyber-Physical Systems Security: State of the Art and Outlook

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Security and Quality in Cyber-Physical Systems Engineering

Abstract

Digital twins refer to virtual replicas of physical objects that, inter alia, enable to monitor, visualize, and predict states of cyber-physical systems (CPSs). These capabilities yield efficiency gains and quality improvements in manufacturing processes. In addition, the concept of digital twins can also be leveraged to advance the security of the smart factory. More precisely, this concept can be applied as early as in the design phase by providing engineers the means to spot security flaws in the specification of the CPS. Security testing or intrusion detection are other security-enhancing technical use cases of digital twins that can be realized in systems engineering or during plant operation. In this chapter, we will discuss how digital twins can accompany their physical counterparts throughout the entire lifecycle and thereby strengthen the security of CPSs. The findings of this chapter indicate that the concept of digital twins will open up new paths to secure CPSs. However, efficiently creating, maintaining, and running digital twins still represents a major research challenge, as the overhead costs hinder the adoption of this concept. We believe that these insights are valuable to shape future research in this emerging research area at the intersection of digital twins and information security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alam, K. M., & Saddik, A. E. (2017). C2PS: A digital twin architecture reference model for the cloud-based cyber-physical systems. IEEE Access, 5, 2050–2062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonioli, D., Agrawal, A., & Tippenhauer, N. O. (2016). Towards high-interaction virtual ICS honeypots-in-a-box. In Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems Security and Privacy’, CPS-SPC ’16 (pp. 13–22). New York, NY: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baheti, R., & Gill, H. (2011). Cyber-physical systems. The Impact of Control Technology, 12, 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bécue, A., Fourastier, Y., Praça, I., Savarit, A., Baron, C., Gradussofs, B., et al., (2018). Cyberfactory#1 — securing the industry 4.0 with cyber-ranges and digital twins. In 2018 14th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS) (pp. 1–4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitton, R., Gluck, T., Stan, O., Inokuchi, M., Ohta, Y., Yamada, Y., et al., (2018). Deriving a cost-effective digital twin of an ICS to facilitate security evaluation. In J. Lopez, J. Zhou & M. Soriano (Eds.), Computer Security (pp. 533–554). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boschert, S., & Rosen, R. (2016), Digital twin—the simulation aspect (pp. 59–74). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracho, A., Saygin, C., Wan, H., Lee, Y., & Zarreh, A. (2018). A simulation-based platform for assessing the impact of cyber-threats on smart manufacturing systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, 1116–1127. 46th SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference, NAMRC 46, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cárdenas, A. A., Amin, S., Lin, Z.-S., Huang, Y.-L., Huang, C.-Y., & Sastry, S. (2011). Attacks against process control systems: Risk assessment, detection, and response. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, ASIACCS ’11 (pp. 355–366). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caselli, M., Zambon, E., Amann, J., Sommer, R., & Kargl, F. (2016). Specification mining for intrusion detection in networked control systems (pp. 791–806), Berkeley: USENIX Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabukswar, R., Sinopoli, B., Karsai, G., Giani, A., Neema, H., & Davis, A. (2010). Simulation of network attacks on SCADA systems. In First workshop on secure control systems, cyber physical systems week 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., Dave, K., McAvoy, T. J., & Luyben, M. (2003). A nonlinear dynamic model of a vinyl acetate process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(20), 4478–4487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chromik, J., Remke, A., & Haverkort, B. (2016). What’s under the hood? Improving SCADA security with process awareness. Piscataway: IEEE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A., Smith, R., Maglaras, L., & Janicke, H. (2016). Measuring the risk of cyber attack in industrial control systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium for ICS & SCADA Cyber Security Research 2016’, ICS-CSR ’16 (pp. 1–11). Swindon, UK: BCS Learning & Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damjanovic-Behrendt, V. (2018a). A digital twin architecture for security, privacy and safety. ERCIM News, 2018(115).

    Google Scholar 

  • Damjanovic-Behrendt, V. (2018b). A digital twin-based privacy enhancement mechanism for the automotive industry. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theory, Research and Innovation in Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depamelaere, W., Lemaire, L., Vossaert, J., & Naessens, V. (2018). CPS security assessment using automatically generated attack trees. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium for ICS & SCADA Cyber Security Research 2018. London: British Computer Society (BCS).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sá, A. O., d. C. Carmo, L. F. R., & Machado, R. C. S. (2017). Covert attacks in cyber-physical control systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(4), 1641–1651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, J., & Vogel, E. (1993). A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 17(3), 245–255. Industrial challenge problems in process control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragos, Inc. (2018). Industrial Control Vulnerabilities: 2017 in Review, Tech report. Hanover: Dragos, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drath, R., Luder, A., Peschke, J., & Hundt, L. (2008). AutomationML – the glue for seamless automation engineering. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (pp. 616–623).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, D., Berg, M., Dillinger, J., & Stamp, J. (2005). Penetration testing of industrial control systems. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durão, L. F. C. S., Haag, S., Anderl, R., Schützer, K., & Zancul, E. (2018). Digital twin requirements in the context of industry 4.0. In P. Chiabert, A. Bouras, F. Noël & J. Ríos, (Eds.), Product Lifecycle Management to Support Industry 4.0 (pp. 204–214). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart, M., & Ekelhart, A. (2018a). Securing cyber-physical systems through digital twins. ERCIM News, 2018(115).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart, M., & Ekelhart, A. (2018b). A specification-based state replication approach for digital twins. In Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems Security and PrivaCy, CPS-SPC ’18 (pp. 36–47). New York, NY: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart, M., & Ekelhart, A. (2018c). Towards security-aware virtual environments for digital twins. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Cyber-Physical System Security, CPSS ’18 (pp. 61–72). New York, NY: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2016), Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.194.01.0001.01.ENG. Accessed 11 Feb 2019.

  • Fan, W., Du, Z., & Fernández, D. (2015). Taxonomy of honeynet solutions. In 2015 SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) (pp. 1002–1009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichtner, H.-P., & Krammel, M. (2015). Project HoneyTrain, Techreport. Saarbrücken: Koramis GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo, J., Urbina, D., Cardenas, A., Valente, J., Faisal, M., Ruths, J., et al. (2018). A survey of physics-based attack detection in cyber-physical systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(4), 76:1–76:36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaessgen, E. H., & Stargel, D. (2012). The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. air force vehicles. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (pp. 1–14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glavach, D., LaSalle-DeSantis, J., & Zimmerman, S. (2017). Applying and assessing cybersecurity controls for direct digital manufacturing (DDM) systems (pp. 173–194). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gockel, B., Tudor, A., Brandyberry, M., Penmetsa, R., & Tuegel, E. (2012). Challenges with structural life forecasting using realistic mission profiles. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems (pp. 85–113). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinshpun, G., Cichon, T., Dipika, D., & Rossmann, J. (2016). From virtual testbeds to real lightweight robots: Development and deployment of control algorithms for soft robots, with particular reference to industrial peg-in-hole insertion tasks. In Proceedings of ISR 2016: 47st International Symposium on Robotics (pp. 1–7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarnizo, J. D., Tambe, A., Bhunia, S. S., Ochoa, M., Tippenhauer, N. O., Shabtai, A., et al. (2017). Siphon: Towards scalable high-interaction physical honeypots. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Cyber-Physical System Security, CPSS ’17 (pp. 57–68). New York, NY: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haag, S., & Anderl, R. (2018). Digital twin – proof of concept. Manufacturing Letters, 15, 64–66. Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, A. (2016). Operational Technology and Information Technology in Industrial Control Systems (pp. 51–68). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hribernik, K. A., Rabe, L., Thoben, K., & Schumacher, J. (2006). The product avatar as a product-instance-centric information management concept. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 1(4), 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hribernik, K., Wuest, T., & Thoben, K.-D. (2013). Towards product avatars representing middle-of-life information for improving design, development and manufacturing processes. In G. L. Kovács & D. Kochan (Eds.), 6th Programming Languages for Manufacturing (PROLAMAT), Digital Product and Process Development Systems (Vol. AICT-411, pp. 85–96). Dresden, Germany: Springer. Part 2: Digital Product- and Process- Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICS-CERT (2013), Year in review 2012, Technical report, Department of Homeland Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICS-CERT (2015), Year in review 2014, Technical report, Department of Homeland Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICS-CERT (2017), Year in review 2016, Technical report, Department of Homeland Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC (2009). 62443: Industrial communication networks – network and system security. International Standard, First Edition, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 1, 170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaensch, F., Csiszar, A., Scheifele, C., & Verl, A. (2018), Digital twins of manufacturing systems as a base for machine learning. In 2018 25th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP) (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative industrie 4.0 – securing the future of german manufacturing industry, Final report of the industrie 4.0 working group, acatech. München: National Academy of Science and Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissel, R. L., Regenscheid, A. R., Scholl, M. A., & Stine, K. M. (2014). Guidelines for media sanitization. NIST Special Publication, 800(88r1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, E. D., & Langill, J. T. (2014). Industrial Network Security: Securing critical infrastructure networks for smart grid, SCADA, and other Industrial Control Systems. Rockland: Syngress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, W., Prince, D., Hutchison, D., Disso, J. F. P., & Jones, K. (2015). A survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 9, 52–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018). Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016–1022. 16th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotofil, M., & Cárdenas, A. A. (2013). Resilience of process control systems to cyber-physical attacks. In H. Riis Nielson & D. Gollmann (Eds.), Secure IT Systems (pp. 166–182). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krotofil, M., Isakov, A., Winnicki, A., Gollmann, D., Larsen, J., & Gurikov, P. (2015). Rocking the pocket book: Hacking chemical plants for competition and extortion, resreport, Black Hat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langner, R. (2013). To kill a centrifuge: A technical analysis of what stuxnet’s creators tried to achieve. Arlington: The Langner Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, B., Heller, B., & McKeown, N. (2010). A network in a laptop: Rapid prototyping for software-defined networks. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, Hotnets-IX (pp. 19:1–19:6). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., & an Kao, H. (2013). Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufacturing Letters, 1(1), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. M., Assante, M. J., & Conway, T. (2016). Analysis of the cyber attack on the ukrainian power grid, techreport, SANS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, L., Vossaert, J., Jansen, J., & Naessens, V. (2017). A logic-based framework for the security analysis of industrial control systems. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 51(2), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, J., Frechette, S. P., Lipman, R. R., Proctor, F. M., Horst, J. A., Carlisle, M., et al. (2013). Model based enterprise summit report, Technical Report 1820, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüder, A., Schmidt, N., Hell, K., Röpke, H., & Zawisza, J. (2017). Fundamentals of artifact reuse in CPPS (pp. 113–138). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, T., & Singer, B. (2016). Cybersecurity for industrial control systems: SCADA, DCS, PLC, HMI, and SIS. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maybury, M. T. (2013). Global horizons: Final report, resreport AF/ST TR 13-01; Air Force/Small Business Technology Transer 13-01, United States Air Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, S., Konstantinou, C., Wang, X., Davi, L., Sadeghi, A. R., Maniatakos, M., et al. (2016). The cybersecurity landscape in industrial control systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(5), 1039–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., & Chen, I.-R. (2014). A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber-physical systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(4), 55:1–55:29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourtzis, D., Doukas, M., & Bernidaki, D. (2014). Simulation in manufacturing: Review and challenges. Procedia CIRP, 25, 213–229. 8th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology – DET 2014 Disruptive Innovation in Manufacturing Engineering towards the 4th Industrial Revolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negahban, A., & Smith, J. S. (2014). Simulation for manufacturing system design and operation: Literature review and analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(2), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., & Macchi, M. (2017). A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 939–948. 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM2017, 27–30 June 2017, Modena, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivethan, J., & Papa, M. (2016). A SCADA intrusion detection framework that incorporates process semantics. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference, CISRC ’16 (pp. 6:1–6:5). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetta, K. (2018). Gartner top 10 strategic technology trends for 2019, https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2019/. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumley, E., Rice, M., Dunlap, S., & Pecarina, J. (2017). Categorization of cyber training environments for industrial control systems. In M. Rice & S. Shenoi (Eds.), Critical Infrastructure Protection XI (pp. 243–271). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polenghi, A., Fumagalli, L., & Roda, I. (2018). Role of simulation in industrial engineering: Focus on manufacturing systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 496–501. 16th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajkumar, R., Lee, I., Sha, L., & Stankovic, J. (2010). Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution. In Design Automation Conference (pp. 731–736).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reifsnider, K., & Majumdar, P. (2013). Multiphysics stimulated simulation digital twin methods for fleet management. In 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ríos, J., Hernández, J. C., Oliva, M., & Mas, F. (2015). Product avatar as digital counterpart of a physical individual product: Literature review and implications in an aircraft. In ISPE CE (pp. 657–666).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, L., Vestergaard, J., Haslinger, D., Pasquale, A., & Smith, J. (2019). Conpot ICS/SCADA Honeypot. http://conpot.org/. Accessed 11 Feb 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., & Bettenhausen, K. D. (2015). About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 567–572. 15th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, J. E., Alcaraz, C., Roman, R., & Lopez, J. (2017). Analysis of intrusion detection systems in industrial ecosystems. In 14th International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., & Wartzack, S. (2017). Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluse, M., & Rossmann, J. (2016). From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE) (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, G., Steinmetz, C., Pereira, C. E., Muller, I., Garcia, N., Espindola, D., & Rodrigues, R. (2016). Visualising the digital twin using web services and augmented reality. In 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) (pp. 522–527).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, G. N., Steinmetz, C., Pereira, C. E., & Espindola, D. B. (2016). Digital twin data modeling with AutomationML and a communication methodology for data exchange. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(30), 12–17. 4th IFAC Symposium on Telematics Applications TA 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafto, M., Conroy, M., Doyle, R., Glaessgen, E., Kemp, C., LeMoigne, J., et al. (2010). Draft modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap. Technology Area, 11. NASA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., Wan, J., Yan, H., & Suo, H. (2011). A survey of cyber-physical systems. In 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V., & Willcox, K. E. (2018). Engineering design with digital thread. AIAA Journal, 56(11), 4515–4528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. S. (2015). Covert misappropriation of networked control systems: Presenting a feedback structure. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 35(1), 82–92.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sommestad, T., & Hallberg, J. (2012). Cyber security exercises and competitions as a platform for cyber security experiments. In A. Jøsang & B. Carlsson (Eds.), Secure IT Systems (pp. 47–60). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzner, L. (2002). Honeypots: tracking hackers. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, M., & Schmittner, C. (2018). Enabling security and safety evaluation in industry 4.0 use cases with digital twins. ERCIM News, 2018(115).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuegel, E. J., Ingraffea, A. R., Eason, T. G., & Spottswood, S. M. (2011). Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 14. Article ID 154798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlemann, T. H.-J., Lehmann, C., & Steinhilper, R. (2017). The digital twin: Realizing the cyber-physical production system for industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 61(Supplement C), 335–340. The 24th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachálek, J., Bartalskỳ, L., Rovnỳ, O., Šišmišová, D., Morháč, M., & Lokšík, M. (2017). The digital twin of an industrial production line within the industry 4.0 concept. In 2017 21st International Conference on Process Control (PC) (pp. 258–262).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilomanolakis, E., Srinivasa, S., Cordero, C. G., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2016). Multi-stage attack detection and signature generation with ICS honeypots. In NOMS 2016 – 2016 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (pp. 1227–1232).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, D., & Ji, K. (2010). Resilient industrial control system (RICS): Concepts, formulation, metrics, and insights. In 2010 3rd International Symposium on Resilient Control Systems (pp. 15–22).

    Google Scholar 

  • West, T. D., & Blackburn, M. (2017). Is digital thread/digital twin affordable? A systemic assessment of the cost of dod’s latest manhattan project. Procedia Computer Science, 114, 47–56. Complex Adaptive Systems Conference with Theme: Engineering Cyber Physical Systems, CAS October 30 – November 1, 2017, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, T. D., & Pyster, A. (2015). Untangling the digital thread: The challenge and promise of model-based engineering in defense acquisition. INSIGHT, 18(2), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C., & Qin, S. (2017). A research for high interactive honepot based on industrial service. In 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) (pp. 2935–2939).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support by the Christian Doppler Research Association; the Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs; and the National Foundation for Research, Technology, and Development and COMET K1, FFG—Austrian Research Promotion Agency is gratefully acknowledged. Furthermore, this work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) and netidee SCIENCE under grant P30437-N31.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Security and Quality Improvement in the Production System Lifecycle (CDL-SQI), Institute of Information Systems Engineering, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Matthias Eckhart & Andreas Ekelhart

  2. SBA Research, Vienna, Austria

    Matthias Eckhart & Andreas Ekelhart

Authors
  1. Matthias Eckhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Ekelhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Eckhart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Systems Engineering, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Stefan Biffl

  2. Institute of Information Systems Engineering, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Matthias Eckhart

  3. Institute of Ergonomics, Manufacturing Systems and Automation, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany

    Arndt Lüder

  4. Institute of Information Systems Engineering, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Edgar Weippl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eckhart, M., Ekelhart, A. (2019). Digital Twins for Cyber-Physical Systems Security: State of the Art and Outlook. In: Biffl, S., Eckhart, M., Lüder, A., Weippl, E. (eds) Security and Quality in Cyber-Physical Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25312-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25312-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25311-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25312-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation