Elsevier

Fuel

Volume 294, 15 June 2021, 120505
Fuel

Full Length Article
Low-pressure hydrothermal processing of mixed polyolefin wastes into clean fuels

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120505Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A new LP-HTP method was developed for converting mixed polyolefins to clean fuels.

  • Reaction pathways for conversion of PE/PP mixtures in LP-HTP were found.

  • LP-HTP saves 90% of capital costs and 80% of energy compared to SWL.

  • Energy efficiency and GHG emissions are better than producing fuels from crude oil.

  • LP-HTP can produce 190 Mt of fuels annually and save 1.5 billion BOE energy.

Abstract

The amount of polyolefin waste, which is 63% of the total plastic waste, has grown exponentially over the past six decades. Its degradation products pose a serious threat to ecosystems and human health. Polyolefins can be converted to clean oils or fuels by using the supercritical water liquefaction (SWL) method at high pressures (≥23 MPa), which require high capital and energy costs. A new low-pressure (~2 MPa) hydrothermal processing (LP-HTP) method is developed to convert polyolefin waste with 50% or more polypropylene into oils with 87% yield at 450 °C and 45 min. The oils, which are C4 to C25 hydrocarbons, can be distilled into clean gasoline and ultra-low sulfur diesel. With this method, up to 190 million tons of fuels can be produced annually from polyolefin waste, resulting in savings of 92% of the energy and 71% of the GHG emissions compared to conventional methods for producing fuels.

Introduction

The amount of plastic waste has grown exponentially over the past 60 years and accelerated as COVID-19 spread [1], [2], [3], [4]. Only 9% of the total plastic waste is recycled, and 12% is incinerated [1], [5]. The rest, about 6 billion tons, accumulates in landfills and oceans, where it degrades over decades into microplastics, releasing toxic chemicals into the environment, Fig. 1 [1], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Current technologies for removing plastic pollutants from water cost about $0.003 per gallon [11], [12]. Cleaning up the oceans, containing 3.5 × 1018 gallons of water, could cost thousands of times the global GDP. Microplastics have been found in drinking water, plant roots, animals, and human organs [13], [14], [15], [16]. Their impact on ecosystems and human health is potentially devastating [15], [17], [18], [19]. This plastic pollution could be a more urgent threat to all life on land or below water than climate change.

Conventional methods, including incineration, mechanical recycling, and pyrolysis, are ineffective in reducing the plastic waste. Incineration releases greenhouse and toxic gases, has low energy recovery, and requires tipping fees ($20/ton) to be profitable [20], [21], [22]. Mechanical recycling of mixed waste typically results in dark-colored, lower-value products. After several (<10) cycles, polymer properties degrade, and the wastes must be landfilled or incinerated [23], [24], [25]. Pyrolysis can convert mixed plastic waste to oils with yields from 50 to 90%, but the oils have a wide carbon number distribution [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. Fast catalytic pyrolysis generates significant amounts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and up to 40% char, resulting in catalyst deactivation [33], [34]. The oils from pyrolysis need extensive upgrading and separation to produce transportation fuels or other chemicals. Gasification converts mixed plastic waste into gases such as CH4, H2, CO and CO2 [35], [36], [37], [38]. Gasification has a high energy consumption as it requires a temperature between 500 and 800 °C. Embodied energy in plastic waste is lost because no polymer structure or carbon chain is preserved in gasification. The use of supercritical water in gasification can help reduce char formation, but the combination of high temperature and high pressure (≥23 MPa) could result in a high capital cost [39]. Globally, more than 350 million tons of plastic waste is generated annually [1]; 63% are polyolefins, polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), which have short lifetimes (<6 months) and low recycling rates (~5%) in the United States [40]. Thus, almost all new polyolefin products are made from virgin feedstocks.

Supercritical water liquefaction (SWL) was shown to convert plastic waste into lower molecular-weight chemicals and the water serves as a solvent, reactant, or catalyst [41], [42], [43], [44]. Polyolefin waste was converted into oils with high yields (~90%) and no char using SWL. PP waste was converted mainly into naphtha; PE waste was converted into wax, clean gasoline blendstock, or diesel [41], [45]. Previous studies were limited to sorted polyolefin wastes, using high operating pressures (≥23 MPa) and requiring high capital and energy costs. Here, we developed efficient and economical low-pressure (~2 MPa) hydrothermal processing (LP-HTP) methods for converting polyolefin mixtures into clean fuels. The conversion pathways of PE, PP, and their mixtures at various pressures were found from comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography analysis of the products at different reaction times. Our new optimal LP-HTP methods produced oils with high yields (87%) and little char (<0.5%). The oils produced from the mixed wastes with 50% or more PP were distilled to produce qualified clean gasoline and ultra-low sulfur diesel fuels. With LP-HTP, 220 million tons of polyolefin wastes can be converted to 190 million tons of fuels annually, while saving 1.5 billion barrels of crude-oil-equivalent energy and associated GHG emissions compared to conventional fuel production methods. The oils can also be used for producing other monomers to help achieve a circular economy, Fig. 1.

Section snippets

Feedstocks

Four polyolefin feedstocks were used: (1) model HDPE pellets with a 180,000 g/mol weight-average molecular weight purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), (2) model PP pellets with a 250,000 g/mol weight-average molecular weight from Sigma Aldrich, (3) EREMA pellets, made from post-consumer PE grocery bags (EREMA North America, Ipswich, MA), and (4) shredded post-industry PP waste (containers and lids) from Berry Plastics (Berry Global, Evansville, IN). The feed for co-processing tests was

Results and discussion

The compositions of products at different reaction times from model PE, model PP, and mixtures with various PE/PP ratios were analyzed to establish the reaction pathways for PE and PP mixtures at various pressures. The reaction pathways were used for selecting the optimal feedstock compositions and reaction conditions (temperature, pressure, and time) for producing oils with a carbon number distribution from C4 to C25, which can be separated into gasoline (C4-C12) and diesel (C8-C25) fractions.

Conclusions

The new low-pressure hydrothermal processing (LP-HTP) method requires an order-of-magnitude lower pressure and less water than the SWL method for converting polyolefin waste into clean oils. This method requires 90% lower capital costs and 80% less energy compared to SWL. This study shows that LP-HTP can produce oils with C4-C25 hydrocarbons with high yields (87%) and little char (<0.5%). The oils can be distilled into two fractions. The heavy fraction from PE oil was qualified as No. 1

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Yang Xiao for his help in gas analysis using GC-FID and his contribution on manuscript revision; Mr. Louis Caceres for instructions on the heat of combustion testing; Mr. Ed Gaus from Ayalytical Instruments (Chicago, IL) for his help in obtaining data of ON, CN, and Reid vapor pressure; and EREMA and Berry Global for providing polyolefin waste samples. We also appreciate the financial support from the School of Engineering Technology and the Davidson School of Chemical Engineering

References (58)

  • C. Kassargy et al.

    Experimental study of catalytic pyrolysis of polyethylene and polypropylene over USY zeolite and separation to gasoline and diesel-like fuels

    J Anal Appl Pyrolysis

    (2017)
  • K. Akubo et al.

    Aromatic fuel oils produced from the pyrolysis-catalysis of polyethylene plastic with metal-impregnated zeolite catalysts

    J Energy Inst

    (2019)
  • K.-B. Park et al.

    Activator-assisted pyrolysis of polypropylene

    Appl Energy

    (2019)
  • I. Janajreh et al.

    Gasification feasibility of polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene waste and their mixture: experimental studies and modeling

    Sustain Energy Technol Assessments

    (2020)
  • I.I. Ahmed et al.

    Characteristics of syngas from co-gasification of polyethylene and woodchips

    Appl Energy

    (2011)
  • P. Kannan et al.

    Energy recovery from co-gasification of waste polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate blends

    Comput Fluids

    (2013)
  • P. Singh et al.

    Energy recovery from cross-linked polyethylene wastes using pyrolysis and CO2 assisted gasification

    Appl Energy

    (2019)
  • B. Bai et al.

    Experimental study on gasification performance of polypropylene (PP) plastics in supercritical water

    Energy

    (2020)
  • B. Bai et al.

    Experimental investigation on liquefaction of plastic waste to oil in supercritical water

    Waste Manage

    (2019)
  • K. Jin et al.

    Conversion of polyethylene waste into clean fuels and waxes via hydrothermal processing (HTP)

    Fuel

    (2020)
  • P. Vozka et al.

    How to obtain a detailed chemical composition for middle distillates via GC × GC-FID without the need of GC × GC-TOF/MS

    Fuel

    (2019)
  • P. Vozka et al.

    Middle distillates hydrogen content via GC×GC-FID

    Talanta

    (2018)
  • Y. Zhu et al.

    Techno-economic analysis of liquid fuel production from woody biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and upgrading

    Appl Energy

    (2014)
  • A. Fivga et al.

    Pyrolysis of plastic waste for production of heavy fuel substitute: a techno-economic assessment

    Energy

    (2018)
  • P.T. Benavides et al.

    Life-cycle analysis of fuels from post-use non-recycled plastics

    Fuel

    (2017)
  • J. Han et al.

    A comparative assessment of resource efficiency in petroleum refining

    Fuel

    (2015)
  • V. Rodrigues et al.

    LCA of constructing an industrial building: focus on embodied carbon and energy

    Energy Procedia

    (2018)
  • R. Geyer et al.

    Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made

    Sci Adv

    (2017)
  • J. Sills et al.

    Accumulation of plastic waste during COVID-19

    Science

    (2020)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Insights into in-situ catalytic degradation of plastic wastes over zeolite-based catalyst from perspective of three-dimensional pore structure evolution

      2022, Chemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Wherein catalytic pyrolysis is a desirable thermochemical means to efficiently degrade plastic wastes into different monomers and chain length into smaller molecules, simultaneously mitigating green-house gas emission [4,5]. Polyolefin wastes, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) account for 63 % in plastic wastes [6], which exhibit resilient aliphatic CH and sp3 CC bonds that are arduous to cleave. In petroleum refinery industry, the high-molecular-weight hydrocarbons of crude oils can be converted into gasoline, olefinic gases and base chemicals over fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit [7–9].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text