Full length article
Electric vehicle lithium-ion battery recycled content standards for the US – targets, costs, and environmental impacts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106488Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Feasible US EV recycled content standards between 11 and 12% for Co, 7–8% for Li, and 10–12% for ni in 2030.

  • Hydro and direct recycling of EV batteries in the US is profitable at ∼7–8000 t per year.

  • Recycling US EV retirements domestically is more expensive than recycling in China, although environmentally preferable.

Abstract

Lithium-ion battery recycling can decrease life cycle environmental impacts of electric vehicles (EVs) and assist in securing domestic supply chains. However, the US, the third largest market for EVs, has no policies for recycling of batteries at their end-of-life. The European Union has proposed recycled content standards (RCSs) to help drive a circular battery ecosystem. This analysis calculates feasible RCSs for the US based on future sale projections, techno-economic assessment, life cycle assessment, and material flow analysis. Using a 95% confidence interval, results show that 11–12% of cobalt, 7–8% of lithium, and 10–12% of nickel demand in 2030 and 15–18%, 9–11%, and 15–17%, respectively, in 2035, could be met by retired supply assuming closed-loop recycling. While domestic recycling can be profitable at scale and reduce environmental impacts, it is more expensive than exporting to China for recycling. Consequently, policy is likely needed to ensure critical materials are recycled domestically.

Keywords

Circular economy
Lithium-ion batteries
EV
Sustainability
Critical energy materials
Battery policy

Data Availability

  • All data and code used to generate these results are available in the supplementary materials Dryad repository: https://datadryad.org/stash/share/X_DM7T32Z5pJPlaB1ibqXBjAxZL4BU3JxmNgDmC7nbI

Cited by (0)